CMP4267 – Computer Systems

BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
1
Coursework Assignment Brief
Assessment – Undergraduate
Academic Year 2024-25
Module Title: Computer Systems
Module Code: CMP4267
Assessment Type
Coursework
Level
Weighting
100%
Word Count/Workload
2000-2500
Submission Date
Task 1a: w/c 07/10/2024
Task 1b: w/c 28/10/2024
Task 2: w/c 11/11/2024
Task 3: 09/12/2024
Submission Time
Task 1a: In-class
Task 1b: in-class
Task 2: In-class
Task 3: 3 PM
Module Leader
Waldo Cervantes
Time Limit
N/A
Assessment Information
Assessment Summary
(with type)
This assessment is a portfolio of 4 tasks that aims for you to
demonstrate your knowledge on computer systems and your
ability to design computer-based solutions for a given
problem.
You will work individually to develop a prototype of a digital
device that should address how it helps to address at least
one UN sustainability goal.
Knowledge learnt will be assessed by means of two multiplechoice
quizzes, in person demonstration to validate the work
studied and a written article.
Assessment Title
IoT Centred Knowledge Based Article (Portfolio)
Things to include:
Element Date Weight
1a – Quiz A w/c 07/10/2024 10%
1b – Quiz B w/c 28/10/2024 20%
2 – In-person
Demonstration
w/c 11/11/2024 20%
3 – Knowledge
Based Article
3:00pm 09/12/2024 50%
Completion of this assessment will address the following learning outcomes:
1 Identify fundamental principles of computer systems and architecture.
2 Discuss the applications and core security concepts for computer systems.
3 Apply key computer systems knowledge to design digital solutions.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
2
Submission Information
This assessment will be marked anonymously and should show your student number only.
Submit this coursework assessment task via Moodle.
Late Submission
Assessments must be submitted in the format specified in the assessment task, by the deadline
and to the submission point published on Moodle. Failure to submit by the published deadline will
result in penalties which are set out in Section 6 of the Academic Regulations, available at:
https://icity.bcu.ac.uk/Quality-Enhancement-and-Inclusion/Quality-Assurance-and-
Enhancement/Academic-Regulations
Word Count
The maximum word count for this module assessment is shown on Page 1. A +10% margin of
tolerance is applied, beyond which nothing further will be marked. Marks cannot be awarded for
any learning outcomes addressed outside the word count.
The word count refers to everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables,
citations, quotes, lists etc.). Everything before (i.e. abstract, acknowledgements, contents,
executive summaries etc.) and after (i.e. references, bibliographies, appendices etc) is not
included in the word count limit.
Referencing Style
• BCU Harvard
More information on referencing is available here: https://www.bcu.ac.uk/library/services-andsupport/
referencing
Use of Artificial Intelligence
Whilst AI tools can be helpful in assisting learning, when it comes to assessment, the Academic
Misconduct Procedure is clear that this should be a student’s own original work and not the work of
other people or AI tools.
The Use of AI Tools – Student Guidelines document follows the same guidelines your lecturers
use. If you are unsure of whether AI is appropriate within your work, please read the guidelines or
ask your lecturer. For advice and guidance around academic writing, please visit the Centre for
Academic Success.
Academic Integrity Guidance
Academic integrity is the attitude of approaching your academic work honestly, by completing and
submitting your own original work, attributing and acknowledging your sources when necessary.
Understanding good academic practice in written and oral work is a key element of academic
integrity. It is a positive aspect of joining an academic community, showing familiarity with and
acknowledging sources of evidence. The skills you require at higher education may differ from
those learned elsewhere such as school or college.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
3
You will be required to follow specific academic conventions which include acknowledging the work
of others through appropriate referencing and citation as explicitly as possible. If you include ideas
or quotations that have not been appropriately acknowledged, this may be seen as plagiarism
which is a form of academic misconduct. If you require support around referencing, please contact
the Centre for Academic Success
It is important to recognise that seeking out learning around academic integrity will help reduce the
risk of misconduct in your work. Skills such as paraphrasing, referencing and citation are integral to
acting with integrity and you can develop and advance these key academic skills through the
Centre for Academic Success (CAS).
To learn more about academic integrity and its importance at university, you can access CAS
resources on Moodle. Furthermore, you can book on to workshops and request 1-2-1 support
around key academic skills.
Academic Misconduct
Academic misconduct is conduct that has or may have the effect of providing you with an unfair
advantage by relying on dishonest means to gain advantage and which therefore compromises
your academic integrity.
The Academic Misconduct procedure sets out the process we will follow, and the penalties we may
apply, in cases where we believe you may have compromised your academic integrity by
committing academic misconduct. The Academic Misconduct Procedure and information about
academic support is available at: https://icity.bcu.ac.uk/Student-Affairs/Appeals-and-
Resolutions/Academic-Misconduct-Procedure
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
4
Task: IoT Centred Knowledge Based Article
Style: Development of a Journal Article in formal style using Harvard style referencing
(template provided).
Rationale: 1a, 1b, 2 and 3 allow students to demonstrate experience of both hardware and
software implementation of basic IOT concepts, learnt during labs sessions and in private
study time. The delivery of the article encourages students to read about new trends and the
latest developments in preparation for continued academic study. Together, the combination
of in-person quizzes, demonstration and Knowledge-Based Article writing encourages
students to engage in professional, reflective dialogue with their peers and the course team.
Description:
1a – Quiz A: A short quiz to assess the foundations of basic electronics and circuit
operations that demonstrate a computer system. (10%)
1b – Quiz B: Quiz based on a bank of questions reflecting course materials including
number systems and operations of combinational logic that can represent the fundamentals
of a computer system architecture. (20%)
2 – In-person Demonstration: Demonstrate knowledge of basic IOT and design skills in
preparation for the Knowledge-Based article. (20%)
3 – Knowledge Based Article: The article is to be written based on theoretical and practical
skills learnt in lab sessions. Theoretical and practical skills include Computer logic, Digital
electronics, Computer Hardware and Security. The assessment emphasises the writer’s
ability to research and reflect on the knowledge acquired during the study of Computer
Systems. Research may include reading scientific journals and other relevant literature
suggested by lecturers or through personal interest throughout the module. The assessment
contains digital problems to solve using logic principles and the ability to translate these into
practice through the designing of circuit configuration diagrams and the implementation of
software. The problems to be addressed being based on lab exercises which students have
completed prior to the assessment exercise. The article component of the assessment is
designed to develop critical thinking about skill learnt by bringing together research and
practice in a distinctive discussion of how they would lead technological advancements in
the future while maintaining digital security. (50%)
Additional information:
CMP4267 Computer Systems
Knowledge-Based Article
This is an individual piece of work submitted through Moodle. The coursework emphasises
on your ability to research and reflect on the knowledge acquired during the study of
computer systems. It contains digital problems to solve using logic principles and the ability
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
5
to translate these into practice through the designing of circuit configuration diagrams and
the discussion of applicable components and software. It develops critical thinking by
bringing together research and practice in a distinctive discussion of how you would lead
technological advancements.
The following provides detailed expectations and guidance on word count and allocated
marks.
1. Imagine you have been employed by a technology company known for the
digitisation of products and devices to provide real-time connectivity and data
transfer. As such, you have been requested to research the up-to-date literature and
write a brief review. This review should consist of introducing the current and future
transfer. As such, you have been requested to research the up-to-date literature and
write a brief review. This review should consist of the following topics:
• the current and future trends of computing technology
• Internet of Things as an enabler of digitising the physical world
• the consideration of modern networking and system security approaches.
(600 words)
(Marks: 20)
2. The company now plans to launch its own range of smart devices for the home
consumer market. To remain competitive, a range of products that are aligned to the
UN’s sustainability goals must be considered. Your manager requests you to design
and develop one such product for a client. This section of your article focuses on the
technical development of the product assigned to you (you will be assigned a product
category at random). The client requests that you produce the following:
• Describe the foundation of your product’s system architecture via a logic circuit
with its associated truth tables that describe its intended work and its Boolean
expression.
• You should use the techniques introduced and reviewed in class.
(400 words)
(Marks: 25)
3. Based on your research and knowledge, in this section you should propose the
hardware requirements to implement a solution of the system you designed in Part 2.
You should use a design package such as Tinkercad, and include a detailed
discussion of your allocated product which includes the following:
• Block diagram demonstrating product operation and sensors integration, and
description of the block diagram
• Schematic of your developed Circuit
• Codes
• Results, including explanation of the components used within your circuit and
their intended operations
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
6
(500 words)
(Marks: 25)
4. The article should end with your own reflection on the following:
• Draw conclusive recommendations on how you believe the technological
competitiveness of Parts 2 and 3 can be further achieved for both the
consumer and manufacturer.
(300 words)
(Marks: 10)
• Security considerations relevant to your designs such as communication
encryption, firewall configuration and end-user awareness for IOT-style
devices.
(300 words)
(Marks: 10)
5. The presentation of your Knowledge Article is based on institutional standards
recommended by the Institute of Engineering and Technology (IET) or Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE) and with adherence to Birmingham City
University’s academic assessment policy and guidance. This part measures your
ability to follow instructions and present your work in a professional manner, with
clear attention to your writing, structure and ability to reference using the Harvard
approach. The following will assist you in accomplishing your article to standard.
• Use the ‘CS Article Template.doc’ which can be found on Moodle to convert
and deliver your article in the professional academic format. It is adapted from
the IEEE and takes into account the IET requirements.
(Marks: 10)
(Total Marks: 100)
For advice on writing style, referencing and academic skills, please make use of the Centre
for Academic Success: Centre for Academic Success – student support | Birmingham City
University (bcu.ac.uk)
Transferable skills:
Encourages realisation of multi-disciplinary computing, challenges students to interface with
the environment by configuring Internet of Things devices and systems for collecting data for
the proposed solution. Fosters the ability to respond to a technical brief to find practical
solutions to problems; evaluate and respond to the challenges of interdisciplinary
approaches; respond flexibly and imaginatively within a fixed timescale.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
7
Marking Criteria:
Table of Assessment Criteria and Associated Grading Criteria
Task 2 – In-person Demonstration (20%)
Learning
outcome
LO1 – Identify fundamental principles of computer systems and architecture.
Assessment
Criteria
à
Background research on
allocated product.
Research on sustainability goals
relevant to product.
Product designs formulated
so far.
Weight: 35% 30% 35%
Grading
Criteria
0 – 20%
Fail
Unable to discuss
background research or
demonstrates inaccurate
understanding.
Sustainability goals not presented,
or very minimal detail provided.
Designs presented are unsuitable for
the intended purpose.
21 – 39%
Fail
Basic understanding of the
allocated product with major
deficiencies.
At least one goal is presented with
very minimal detail.
Designs contain basic information with
no attempt at using visual aids
(images or diagrams).
40 – 49% Allocated product is discussed
with some accuracy, but more
detail is needed.
Multiple goals relevant to the product
are presented with minimal detail.
Designs show evidence of planning
beyond a basic outline. Visual aids
(images and diagrams) are used but
could be improved.
50 – 59% Multiple features of the product
are discussed, but more detail is
needed, or one feature is
addressed in reasonable detail.
Multiple relevant goals are presented.
The linkage between the product and
goals is clear but requires more detail.
Designs are well thought out with
appropriate visual aids (images and
diagrams), though some areas could
be improved.
60 – 64% Multiple product features are
addressed in detail, showing
some awareness of related
issues.
Goals are presented in detail.
Research has some impact on the
product design.
Designs are well thought out with
adequate amount of information.
Visual aids (images and diagrams)
are used, with minor errors.
65 – 69% Multiple product features are
addressed in detail, showing
knowledge of related issues.
Goals are presented in detail, with a
clear linkage between the product and
goals. Research has a notable impact
on the product design.
Designs are well thought out with
adequate amount of information.
Visual aids (images and diagrams)
are used.
70 – 79% Multiple features are addressed
accurately, demonstrating very
good knowledge and
understanding of related issues.
Goals are presented in detail, with a
clear and well-thought-out linkage
between the product and goals.
Research has a significant impact on
product design.
Good designs with effective use of
visual aids (images and diagrams).
80 – 89% Multiple features are presented
accurately with cutting-edge
knowledge and understanding,
showing clear and confident
awareness of related issues.
Goals are presented in detail, with a
clearly outlined linkage to the product.
The research conducted has a
significant impact on product design.
Very good designs with excellent use
of visual aids (images and diagrams).
Designs are well thought out with very
little room for improvement.
90 – 100% Multiple features are addressed
accurately, showing a level of
knowledge and understanding
that exceeds expectations.
Demonstrates confident,
convincing, and wide-ranging
knowledge of related areas.
An excellent choice of goals is
presented, with a detailed and clearly
outlined linkage to the product.
Research is clearly driving the product
design.
Outstanding designs with innovative
use of visual aids (images and
diagrams). Very high attention to detail
throughout.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
8
Task 3 – Knowledge Based Article (50%)
Learning
outcome LO1 – Identify
fundamental
principles of
computer systems
and architecture.
LO2 – Discuss the applications and core
security concepts for computer systems.
LO3 – Apply key computer systems
knowledge to design digital solutions.
Assessment
Criteria
à
1.
Literature report:
Topics
– current trends
– future trends
– IoT digitisation
– Modern networking
– Security
2.
Technical
development for
Client:
Topics
– System architecture
– Logic circuit
– Truth tables
– Boolean expression
3.
Requirements:
Topics
– Tinkercad circuit
(schematic)
-Block diagram
– Code
-Result and
discussion
4.
Evaluation:
Topics
– Technological
competitiveness
– Security
consideration
5.
Article
presentation:
– Quality of writing
– Article structure
– Template
Weight: 20 25 25 20 10
Grading
Criteria
0 – 20%
Fail
Literature report not
attempted. No topics
covered.
Technical challenges
for the client not
attempted.
No knowledge of
requirements
demonstrated.
Neither
technological nor
security
considerations
provided.
Poor quality writing
with no structure.
21 – 39%
Fail
At least one topic has
been reported but not
in detail.
Emerging technical
ability. At least one
topic has been
developed but not in
detail.
At least one topic
has been
documented but not
in detail.
Emerging
evaluation. At
least one topic
has been reported
but not in detail.
Emerging
presentation. Either
quality of writing or
article structure has
been addressed.
40 – 49%
An elementary
literature report. At
least two topics have
been reported with
minimum detail.
Two topics have been
developed for the client
with minimum detail.
Elementary
requirements. At
least two topics
have been
documented.
Both topics have
been reported to a
minimum detail.
Both quality of writing
and article structure
have been
addressed.
50 – 59%
Standard literature
report. Three topics
have been reported
with minimum detail.
Three topics have been
developed for the client
with minimum detail.
All four topics have
been documented,
and technical detail
has some errors.
Both topics have
been reported
with adequate
detail, with minor
deficiencies.
Both quality of writing
and article structure
have been
addressed. The
article template has
been used.
60 – 64%
Four topics have
been reported with
an adequate level of
detail based on
relevant references.
Academic
referencing used,
with minor errors.
Good technical ability.
All four topics for the
client have been
developed.
Good development
of requirements. All
four topics have
been documented in
detail with minor
technical errors
Both topics have
been reported in
detail.
Quality of writing and
article structure have
been addressed to a
level 4 standard. The
template has been
used.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
9
65 – 69%
Four topics have
been reported in
detail. Relevant
literature and
academic
referencing have
been utilised
throughout.
Good technical ability.
All four topics for the
client have been
developed with
adequate level of detail
and appear to be
correct.
Good requirements.
All four topics have
been documented in
detail, and technical
aspects appear to
be correct.
Both topics have
been reported in
detail and critically
appraised.
Quality of writing and
article structure have
been addressed to a
level 4 standard. The
template has been
used and care has
been taken to follow
formatting guidance.
70 – 79%
A robust literature
report. All topics
have been reported
in detail and clearly
referenced using
adequate academic
literature. Contrasting
arguments are
introduced.
Robust technical ability.
All four topics have
been developed in
detail and are correct.
All four topics have
been documented in
detail. Technical
aspects are correct.
Robust
evaluation. Both
topics have been
reported in detail
as well as critically
appraised in
detail.
Quality and structure
have been
addressed in an
academic standard.
The template has
been used,
formatting guidance
and Harvard
referencing have
been employed.
Individual sections
appear appropriately
weighted.
80 – 89%
A robust and
‘publication ready’
literature report. All
topics have been
reported in detail and
clearly referenced
using up-to-date and
relevant academic
literature. Contrasting
arguments are
developed and
alternate solutions
are proposed.
Professional technical
ability. All four topics
have been developed
in detail and are correct
Justification is provided
for logic implemented.
Requirements met
to a professional
standard. All four
topics have been
documented in
detail. Technical
aspects are correct,
and the discussion
contains contrasting
arguments.
Both topics have
been reported in
detail and critically
appraised in
detail. Alternative
solutions have
been suggested.
Quality and structure
have been addressed.
The template has
been used, formatting
guidance and Harvard
referencing have been
employed. Individual
sections are
appropriately
weighted, and the
article logically flows.
The article is ready to
be published.
90 – 100%
An outstanding and
‘publication ready’
literature report. All
topics have been
reported in detail and
clearly referenced.
Contrasting
arguments are
developed and
alternate solutions
are proposed based
on up-to-date and
state of the art
literature.
All four topics have
been developed in
detail and all appear to
be correct. Extensive
justification is provided
for logic implemented.
Alternative and
appropriate solutions
are introduced.
Requirements
developed to a
professional
standard. All four
topics have been
documented in
extensive and
adequate detail.
Technical aspects
are correct and the
discussion contains
contrasting
arguments and
novel solutions.
Both topics have
been reported in
detail and critically
appraised.
Alternative
solutions have
been suggested
and suitably
researched.
Quality and structure
have been addressed
in a publication-ready
standard following the
requirements for a
high impact journal.
Submission Details:
Format: Upload to Moodle
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
10
Regulations:
• The minimum pass mark for a module is 40%
• Re-sit marks are capped at 40%
Full academic regulations are available for download using the link provided above in the IMPORTANT
STATEMENTS section
Late Penalties
If you submit an assessment late at the first attempt, then you will be subject to one of the
following penalties:
• if the submission is made between 1 and 24 hours after the published deadline the
original mark awarded will be reduced by 5%. For example, a mark of 60% will be
reduced by 3% so that the mark that the student will receive is 57%.
• if the submission is made between 24 hours and one week (5 working days) after
the published deadline the original mark awarded will be reduced by 10%. For
example, a mark of 60% will be reduced by 6% so that the mark the student will
receive is 54%.
• if the submission is made after 5 days following the deadline, your work will be
deemed as a fail and returned to you unmarked.
The reduction in the mark will not be applied in the following two cases:
o the mark is below the pass mark for the assessment. In this case the mark
achieved by the student will stand
o where a deduction will reduce the mark from a pass to a fail. In this case the
mark awarded will be the threshold (i.e., 50%)
Please note:
• If you submit a re-assessment late then it will be deemed as a fail and returned
to you unmarked.
Feedback:
Marks and Feedback on your work will normally be provided within 20 working days of its
submission deadline.
Where to get help:
Times of support can be found on Moodle.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
11
Students can get additional support from the library support for searching for information
and finding academic sources. See their iCity page for more information:
http://libanswers.bcu.ac.uk/
The Centre for Academic Success offers 1:1 advice and feedback on academic writing,
referencing, study skills and maths/statistics/computing. See their iCity page for more
information: https://icity.bcu.ac.uk/celt/centre-for-academic-success
Additional assignment advice can be found here: https://libguides.bcu.ac.uk/MA
Fit to Submit:
Are you ready to submit your assignment? Review this assignment brief and consider
whether you have met the criteria. Use any checklists provided to ensure that you have
done everything needed.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
12
Assignment Checklist
Run through this simple tick list before submitting your work!
Report
Well prepared materials make your work look more professional and easier to understand.
Item Action Done?
1 I have used the spellchecker and proofread the work correcting errors several times.
2 I have checked that all material is directly related to the assignment tasks.
3 I have checked that all the required information has been included in the work.
4 The work is professionally presented using consistent headings, fonts and layout.
5 All tables and images are numbered and captioned.
6 I have used the structure specified in the assignment.
Referencing and Originality
Your work will be subjected to checks to ensure it is not copied. Derivative work may leave you
subject to penalties, including in extreme cases, expulsion from the University.
Item Action Done?
1 All images and tables are fully referenced.
2 I have not copied any material from anywhere else. All sentences have been
paraphrased into my own words.
3 All references appear in the references section at the end of the presentation.
4 All references are cited in the text in the form of (author,
year). See https://www.bcu.ac.uk/library/services-andsupport/
referencing for more details.
5 If I have used quotes, these are fully referenced, appear in quotation marks and
form only a small part of my work.
BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
CMP4267 – Computer Systems
13
Content
Is your work complete? Have you included all the required elements?
Task and Description
1 – Literature Review (600 words, 20 marks)
Identify and summarise current computing technology trends
Predict and discuss future computing technology trends
Review what the IoT is and its role in digitalisation
Introduction and discussion on networking and security approaches
Cite all sources using Harvard style
2 – Product Design and Development (400 words, 25 marks)
Review and describe you assigned product’s functionality
Create truth tables and write Boolean expression based on the functionality
Describe system architecture via logic circuit
Create truth tables and write Boolean expression
Cite all sources using Harvard style
3 – Hardware Requirements and Circuit Design (500 words, 25 marks)
Create block diagram demonstrating operation and sensors integration
List and explain components used in the circuit
Develop and include circuit schematic (Tinkercad)
Provide codes and present implementation results
Cite all sources using Harvard style
4 – Conclusion and Security Considerations (600 words, 20 marks)
Draw recommendations for enhancing technological competitiveness for consumer and
manufacturer
Discuss encryption, firewall configuration, and user awareness
Cite all sources using Harvard style
5 – Presentation and Formatting (10 marks)
Download and use ‘CS Article Template.doc’ from Moodle
Ensure article meets IET/IEEE standards
Ensure clear writing, logical structure, and professional presentation
Use Harvard referencing style consistently

CMP4267 UG Assessment Brief 2024-5_077d0288a7c1d6696dbc2bf56d06f550